ALB Micki

Showing posts with label Israel economy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Israel economy. Show all posts

Monday, June 9, 2025

The Hague


 Far-right Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir responded proudly Wednesday to reports that the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court was considering arrest warrants against him and fellow extremist minister Bezalel Smotrich over their roles in expanding illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank.

Ben-Gvir, who has openly fought efforts to deliver aid to starving Palestinians and worked to prevent progress toward a durable cease-fire, wrote in a social media post that "when The Hague is against me, I know I'm on the right path"—suggesting he would view an arrest warrant from the ICC as a badge of honor.

"I have one clear message to the chief prosecutor at the International Criminal Court in The Hague," he wrote. "No arrest warrant of any kind will deter me from continuing to work for the people of Israel and the Land of Israel. The prosecutor in The Hague does not scare me."

The Israeli minister's post came after The Wall Street Journalreported that ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan "was preparing to seek arrest warrants for two far-right Israeli cabinet members before he went on leave as the United Nations investigates sexual-assault allegations against him."

The Journal noted that the cases center on Ben-Gvir and Smotrich's "roles in expanding Jewish settlements in the West Bank." Both ministers live in West Bank settlements, which have expanded significantly since Israel began its full-scale assault on the Gaza Strip following the Hamas-led attack of October 7, 2023.

"A decision on whether to pursue the cases falls to Khan's two deputies, and it is unclear how they plan to proceed," the Journal reported. "ICC prosecutors have been weighing whether Smotrich and Ben-Gvir committed war crimes by pushing construction of West Bank Jewish settlements."

Late last year, the ICC issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, accusing the pair of committing war crimes in the Gaza Strip.

Khan decided to take leave earlier this month amid the U.N. probe of sexual assault allegations made by one of his aides. Khan has denied the accusations, which have thrown the ICC into chaos at a pivotal moment.

Journalist Alice Speri reported for Drop Site earlier this month that "the woman's accusations were far more serious than what has been revealed so far, and include what she described to colleagues as monthslong grooming, psychological coercion, and sexual advances, which eventually escalated into 'unwanted' and 'coerced' sex that lasted nearly a year and continued even after she told Khan that his conduct had left her suicidal."

Khan's alleged conduct and the resulting blowback risks compromising the ICC's work to hold Israeli officials to account for war crimes committed in the occupied Palestinian territories, advocates and court officials fear.

Speri reported that "many at the court, including the alleged victim... understood the abuse allegations were political dynamite and 'a gift for Israel,' as one person put it, and they worried about how they may be used to discredit the ICC, and particularly delegitimize the case against Netanyahu, which many believed was warranted and crucial."

Wednesday, May 28, 2025

Climate Movement

 Almost a decade ago, parties to the Paris treaty agreed to work toward limiting temperature rise this century to 1.5ºC—but 2024 was the hottest year in human history, and countries around the world show no signs of reining in planet-wrecking fossil fuels anywhere near the degree that scientists warn is necessary to prevent catastrophic climate breakdown.

"Crossing 1.5ºC for a whole calendar year is a wake-up call for the world," said Olympic gold medalist and XR U.K. spokesperson Etienne Stott, highlighting another alarming record from last year. "If we want to avoid crossing further tipping points we need a complete transformation of society."

Extinction Rebellion and other climate groups held a funeral for the Paris agreement's 1.5°C temperature target in Cambridge, England on May 10, 2025. (Photo: Derek Langley)

Scientists from universities in the United Kingdom and Germany warned in a peer-reviewed paper published in the journal Earth System Dynamics last month that humankind is at risk of triggering various climate tipping points absent urgent action to dramatically reduce emissions from fossil fuels.

"There are levers policymakers can pull to rapidly phase out fossil fuels, but this requires standing up to powerful interests," Stott said Saturday. "Activists need to build power, resilience, and the world we want to see in our communities; but we also need to keep seeking the spark that will cause the worldwide transformation we need to see."

In addition to the Cambridge and U.K. arms of Extinction Rebellion, Saturday's action was organized by Cambridge Greenpeace, Cambridge Stop the War, and the Organization of Radical Cambridge Activists (ORCA).

Varsity, the independent student newspaper at the University of Cambridge, reported that the marchers "rallied at Christ's Pieces, where they heard from one of the organizers, who emphasised the harm caused by exceeding 1.5ºC of warming."

"The march then proceeded up Christ's Lane and down Sidney Street, led by a group of 'Red Rebels,' dressed in red robes with faces painted white, followed by 'pall bearers' carrying coffins painted black, with the words 'Inaction Is Death' in white," according to Varsity. "The procession was completed by a samba band who drummed as they walked, followed by protesters carrying a large sign reading 'Don't silence the science,' along with many other smaller placards."

Members of the "Red Rebel Brigade" led a procession around Cambridge, England as part of a funeral for the Paris agreement's 1.5°C temperature target on May 10, 2025. (Photo: Albert Arhó)

Photos from organizers show participants displaying banners with messages such as "No Future on a Dead Planet," and additional messages painted on the black coffins: "1.5ºC Is Dead," "Act Now," "Ecocide," "RIP Earth," and "Web of Life."

"Politicians have broken their promises to keep global temperature rises to a livable 1.5ºC," declared Zoe Flint, a spokesperson for XR Cambridge. "For decades, people around the world have been resisting environmental devastation in their own communities and beyond—often facing state repression and violence as a result."

"With dozens of political protesters now in prison in this country, that repression has come to the U.K. too," Flint noted. "But when those least responsible for climate breakdown suffer the worst effects, we can't afford to give up the fight."

Bright Red


 U.S. President Donald Trump opened Memorial Day in the most disgusting way possible, not by praising our fallen heroes but by attacking Democrats. He wrote on his Nazi-infested social media site on Monday morning:

Happy Memorial Day to all, including the scum that spent the last four years trying to destroy our country through warped radical left minds…

When the President of the United States calls members of the oldest political party in the world and a former president “scum,” it’s not just another ugly outburst that embarrasses America before the rest of the world: It’s a warning sign. A bright red flag.

It tells us that something far more sinister than partisan posturing is afoot. Something our media has already decided to overlook in their perpetual effort to normalize the abominable.

This kind of rhetoric isn’t new, and it’s not harmless. History has shown us—again and again—that when political leaders use dehumanizing language to vilify their opponents, they’re in actuality laying the groundwork for authoritarianism, repression, and violence.

Words matter. In every fascist movement of the 20th century, it started with the words. Before the arrests, before the beatings, before the camps, there were the words.

In a healthy democracy, political disagreements are expected. Even fierce debates over policy and direction are part of the process. But a functioning democracy depends on a shared understanding that both sides, no matter how much they disagree, are legitimate participants in the system.

The moment that idea is tossed aside—when one side starts branding the other not as the loyal opposition but as enemies, traitors, or “scum”—democracy starts to fail.

When a president engages in this kind of language, he’s not just lashing out at critics. He’s explicitly trying to erase the legitimacy of any voice but his own.

This tactic is not original. It’s ripped from the playbooks of authoritarians throughout history.

  • Hitler routinely referred to Jews, communists, and democratic socialists as “vermin” and “filth,” conditioning the German public to accept ever-increasing acts of brutality and repression.
  • In Rwanda, Hutu leaders called Tutsis “cockroaches” on the radio for months before the genocide began.
  • In Serbia, Slobodan Milošević labeled political opponents and ethnic minorities as “parasites” and “traitors” before launching ethnic cleansing campaigns.

Language like this isn’t about winning arguments. It’s about destroying opposition.

Donald Trump has flirted with this disgusting sort of rhetoric for years, calling the press “the enemy of the people,” mocking disabled journalists, referring to immigrants as “animals,” and branding his political opponents as “radicals” or “traitors.”

But labeling Democrats—over 45 million American citizens—as “scum” is a different level of escalation. It’s not just name-calling. It’s a signal. A test balloon. A way of seeing how far he can go. And if there’s no consequence, he’ll go further.

What happens when a leader no longer sees himself as the president of all Americans, but only of those who worship him? What happens when one party becomes synonymous with the state, and all others are demonized?

You get systems like Vladimir Putin’s Russia, where opposition leaders are jailed, poisoned, or pushed out of windows. You get Viktor Orbán’s Hungary, where the ruling party rewrites the constitution to lock in power and crush dissent. You get a country where elections still happen, but they no longer mean anything.

Trump’s use of the word “scum” may seem like just another day in MAGA world, but it is, in fact, part of a much larger and more deliberate strategy. It’s designed to radicalize his base, to cast Democrats not as fellow Americans with different ideas but as dangerous enemies who must be defeated at all costs. It’s designed to terrify Trump’s opponents and paralyze the media.

When you convince people that the opposition is not just wrong but evil, the next logical step is to justify extraordinary actions to stop them, whether that’s purging them from government, throwing them in jail, or inciting paramilitary violence against them.

We’ve already seen where this leads.

January 6, for example, wasn’t some spontaneous tantrum. It was the inevitable result of years of delegitimization and demonization of Democrats. The people who stormed the Capitol sincerely believed they were saving America from “scum” who had stolen the presidency. They were acting on the poisonous lie that only one side has the right to rule and that any electoral outcome that contradicts their will is illegitimate. A lie that came straight from Trump and his morbidly rich neofascist enablers.

This is how democracies die; not all at once, but in a slow, deliberate campaign of character assassination against political rivals, institutions, and the rule of law. It happens when a strongman convinces just enough people that he alone is the embodiment of the nation, and that anyone who opposes him is a threat to the country itself.

And once that belief takes root, atrocities become not just possible, but justified. And, in most cases, inevitable. We’re already seen this in the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia and the Venezuelans who Trump deported to El Salvador and the Asians he deported to Africa, in both cases in defiance of court orders.

From Pinochet throwing small-d democrats he called “subversivos” and “terroristas” out of helicopters over the ocean, to Stalin using the phrase “enemy of the people” (враг народа) to describe democracy advocates, to Mao calling educated people monsters and demons” (牛鬼蛇神) as he killed an estimated 35 million of them, this is an old, old story.

It’s the same type of language that the Klan used for centuries here in America as they embarked on campaigns of terror and murder. And that the paramilitary groups that have largely replaced them in the 21st century continue to use.

It’s also important to note that when Trump calls people who didn’t vote for him “scum,” he’s not just talking about elected officials. He’s talking about more than half the country.

He’s talking about your neighbors, your coworkers, maybe your family members. He’s talking about teachers, nurses, scientists, union workers, veterans; millions of Americans who simply don’t buy into his brand of neofascist grievance politics. He’s trying to turn Americans against each other so he can seize even more power out of the chaos he creates.

This kind of dehumanization also serves a more practical political purpose: It undermines accountability. If Democrats are “scum,” then their investigations into Trump’s corruption are not legitimate. If the media is “fake news,” then any critical reporting is a hoax. If the courts rule against him, they’re “rigged.” It’s a classic authoritarian tactic: Delegitimize all checks on your power and paint yourself as the sole source of truth.

In doing so, Trump is also poisoning the well for any future attempt at national unity or reconciliation.

Once you’ve labeled your opponents as subhuman, how do you work with them? How do you compromise to do what’s best for the country? You don’t.

And that’s exactly the point. He doesn’t want compromise. He wants domination. He wants a political system like in Russia or Hungary, where the only choice is himself.

We can’t afford to normalize this. We can’t laugh it off as Trump being Trump. We can’t wait and hope that someone, somewhere, will step in and draw a line. We have to be that line. We have to call this what it is: a deliberate, dangerous assault on the core of American democracy.

Words matter. In every fascist movement of the 20th century, it started with the words. Before the arrests, before the beatings, before the camps, there were the words. And in every case, those words went unchallenged until it was too late.

It’s not too late now. But we are closer than we’ve ever been. We must push back hard against this dehumanizing rhetoric, demand better from our leaders, and defend the democratic principle that every citizen, no matter their party, is entitled to dignity, voice, and full participation in the political process.

Because once a president gets away with calling fellow Americans “scum,” it’s only a matter of time before he treats them that way.

Sunday, May 18, 2025

You Eat


"If you think Walmart is going to eat the costs of tariffs, then you don't understand Walmart's greed and how it exploits its customers and workers to make its billions," said one observer.

U.S. President Donald Trump verbally thrashed Walmart on Saturday following the retailer's announcement this week that it expects to raise prices on some goods as a result of tariffs imposed by the White House.

On his social media platform Truth Social, Trump wrote that Walmart should "STOP trying to blame Tariffs as the reason for raising prices throughout the chain."

"Between Walmart and China they should, as is said, 'EAT THE TARIFFS,' and not charge valued customers ANYTHING. I'll be watching, and so will your customers!!!" he wrote.

On Thursday, leaders at Walmart said that they will have to raise prices in response to tariffs imposed by the Trump administration even after lowered duties on Chinese imports were announced.

The Trump administration has placed 10% universal tariff on goods entering the United States and imposed higher tariffs on goods coming from China—though on Monday the two countries said they reached a deal to temporarily lower the tariffs they had imposed on one another while they try to hash out a trade deal. Imports from China will now be subject to a 30% tariff, whereas before many goods coming to the U.S. from China previously had at least a 145% tariff.

CEO Doug McMillon said that Walmart, which is known for its low prices, will do its best to keep prices low, but that "given the magnitude of the tariffs, even at the reduced levels announced this week, we aren't able to absorb all the pressure given the reality of narrow retail margins."

One observer expressed skepticism that Walmart would heed Trump's demand.

"If you think Walmart is going to eat the costs of tariffs, then you don't understand Walmart's greed and how it exploits its customers and workers to make its billions," saidMelanie D'Arrigo, the executive director of a group fighting for universal healthcare in New York State.

Economists expect the cost of tariffs, which are a form of tax applied on imports that can be used to support homegrown industries that employ American workers, to be largely passed on from businesses to American consumers.

In an analysis of the Trump administration's tariff regime as of late April, with the higher duties on Chinese goods in place, the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy found that in 2026 the poorest Americans would see the biggest tariff-induced tax hikes compared to other income groups.

Some observers also used Trump's social media post to highlight that in the past he has claimed that other countries would bear the brunt of tariffs.

The social media posts echoes a recent episode when, last month, after a news report that Amazon would display tariff-based price increases next to the price of products online, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt called such a move "a hostile and political act." After a call between Trump and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, a company spokesperson said displays had been considered for only a section of the site but wouldn't be happening.

Wednesday, May 14, 2025

Financial Attacks

 


This graphic, from the UN Trade and Development in the report “The Scramble for Africa Continues Impacts of Investor-State Dispute Settlement on African Countries,” illustrates ISDS cases that multinational corporations have filed against African nations. Graphic: Albi

For decades, African-based multinational corporations have drained millions, maybe billions, of dollars from Global South taxpayers through a secretive pseudo-court system known as Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS).

These accusations are according to authors Iza Camarillo and Sarah Stevens in their report titled, “The Scramble for Africa Continues: Impacts of Investor-State Dispute Settlement on African Countries,” released by Public Citizen, which according to its website citizen.org, is a “nonprofit consumer advocacy organization that champions the public interest in the halls of power.” 

The report, released in December 2024, takes multinational corporations to task. The authors call out investors for the “draining of millions of dollars from African taxpayers.”

What is ISDS? According to the report, it is “a provision embedded in free trade and investment agreements that empowers multinational corporations and billionaires to sue governments over public interest policies and win compensation from taxpayers.”

---

While African countries were involved in the 1960s in creating a mechanism for settling disputes titled: “the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Dispute (ICSID),”

They were all but totally ignored by these colonial powers who led the process, the report indicates. Many of these corporations are based in countries that are the former colonial masters of the former colonies and are now being sued. 

How did we get here? According to pambazuka.org, in a March 6 article titled “Ongoing Struggles for Resource Control: Economic Sovereignty and Neo-Imperial Backlash,” by Amber Murrey, recent movements for resource sovereignty have not gone without financial penalties incurred by African nations.

Murrey is a member of the International Advisory Board of Pambazuka News and an associate professor of human geography at the University of Oxford. She has called for Africa’s sovereignty over its resources and opposes the pushback the continent receives from its “corporate masters” and former colonizers.

“These and related extractive restructurings and the bold steps to abrogate extractive contracts have triggered a new wave of dismissals in Western policy circles and media—including the near-unanimous description of the West African region as a ‘coup belt,’ and characterizations of its states as ‘hostile,’ ‘unstable,’ ‘jingoistic,’ and ‘disorderly,’” she wrote.

Extractive corporations and mining firms have employed risk consultants to assess the probable damage of resource nationalism to their investment portfolios, Murrey explains.

“Verisk Maplecroft, a firm that focuses on economic forecasting and global risk intelligence, publishes a Resource Nationalism Index (RNI), which ‘measures the risk of expropriation, the imposition of more stringent fiscal regimes, and pressure for companies to source goods and services from local provider,’” she continued.

“In the Index, Verisk Maplecroft claims that 30 countries have ‘witnessed a significant increase in resource nationalism risks,’ with the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Tanzania, Eswatini, and Zimbabwe listed as ‘extreme risks’ in 2019.

It claims that ‘creeping resource nationalism’ is a central ‘threat to operators,’ with DRC accused of ‘squeezing investors’ with a ‘punitive’ 10 percent royalty on coltan, germanium and cobalt,” Murrey added.

The Public Citizen report noted that through the courts, African nations have been “ordered to pay over $5.7 billion to corporations, with an additional $19.5 billion still at stake in ongoing cases. However, due to the lack of publicly available information for many disputes, the actual amounts paid and sought are likely significantly higher.” 

The report also noted that ISDS, along with other debilitating effects on the DRC, are designed to stagnate and limit the government’s actions to address environmental concerns.

“A report by the Columbia Center for Sustainable Investment highlights the connection between ISDS and the fossil fuel sector in Mozambique, emphasizing how oil corporations can leverage ISDS to stifle the transition to renewable energy. The report also notes the potential chilling effect on domestic policies, deterring governments from pursuing progressive environmental initiatives,” noted the scramble for Africa report by Camarillo and Stevens.  

“More than 70% of the corporations that have launched ISDS lawsuits against African nations are based in Australia, Europe, and the United States. European investors account for 32% of all ISDS cases against African countries,”

Camarillo and Stevens note. “African governments have been forced to pay over $200 million in known ISDS awards and settlements to U.S. investors,” they continue.

The impact of these payments is felt far and wide. As a result, “several African nations have already worked to scale back or fully eliminate ISDS from existing investment agreements,” the report notes.

On November 29, 2024, “over 40 civil society organizations and advocacy groups adopted the Entebbe Declaration in Uganda, presenting an African-led vision to reform global investment frameworks.

The Declaration calls for sustainable, human rights-centered investment policies, the replacement of ISDS with equitable regional dispute mechanisms, and prioritization of renewable energy, local value addition, and environmental protection to align with climate and development goals,” the report states.

If more equitable agreements can be reached, they remain to be seen.      


Monday, May 12, 2025

Talks with Putin

 Ukrainian leader has said he would be “waiting” for the Russian president on Thursday but only if Moscow agrees to a truce first

FILE PHOTO: Vladimir Zelensky. ©  Albert Arhó

Ukraine’s Vladimir Zelensky has stated he is ready to “personally” meet Russian President Vladimir Putin in Türkiye on Thursday but only if Moscow first agrees to a truce. His statement came in response to Russia’s proposal to begin peace talks without pre-conditions.

“I will be waiting for Putin in Türkiye on Thursday. Personally,” Zelensky wrote in a post on X on Sunday. He still maintained that Kiev awaits “a full and lasting ceasefire, starting from tomorrow, to provide the necessary basis for diplomacy.” The Ukrainian leader also stated that he expected Moscow not to look for “excuses” this time. 

On Saturday, the Russian president offered Kiev the opportunity to restart direct negotiations in Istanbul, which it unilaterally walked away from in 2022. Moscow was ready to return to the negotiating table without any preconditions, the Russian leader said at the time.

Ukraine should agree to Putin’s proposal of talks ‘immediately’ – Trump
 Ukraine should agree to Putin’s proposal of talks ‘immediately’ – Trump

Russia has repeatedly stated that it was ready for peace talks at any time. It also maintained that it was seeking a lasting solution to the conflict rather than a temporary one. It opposed Kiev’s 30-day truce demand on the grounds that Ukraine would use it to rearm and regroup its military.

Zelensky issued a similar demand on Saturday following a meeting with a group of European leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. They also supported Kiev’s demand that Russia agree to a truce.  

US President Donald Trump also expressed his hope that Moscow and Kiev could soon agree to a month-long truce. He also warned that “the US and its partners will impose further sanctions” if an agreement is reached but not respected. 

On Sunday, the American president said that Kiev should agree to Moscow’s peace talks proposal “immediately.” According to him, Moscow did not want a mere ceasefire but wanted “to negotiate a possible end to the bloodbath.”

The Kremlin has rejected what it described as external pressure surrounding the proposed truce. Putin also noted that Kiev violated the three ceasefires proposed by Moscow: the 30-day US-brokered moratorium on strikes against energy infrastructure, which expired last month, the unconditional Easter ceasefire, and the recently lapsed 72-hour Victory Day ceasefire.

White Refugees

 

A group of people holding a demo outside the US Embassy in Pretoria, South Africa on February 15, 2025 show their gratitude to US President Donald Trump for signing an executive order giving white South Africans special refugee status.

The administration of US President Donald Trump is reportedly preparing to welcome its first group of white refugees from South Africa at the same time as it is arresting and deporting many refugees.

According to US media reports, a charter flight carrying dozens of Afrikaans South Africans is scheduled to arrive on May 12. NPR reported on Thursday that 54 Afrikaaners have been officially granted refugee status, with the process of interviewing them being "unusually quick."

The Afrikaners, descendants of Dutch and other European colonists, represent the first group to benefit from a February executive order that prioritizes their admission under the United States Refugee Admissions Program.

The order, signed on February 7, directs the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security to “take appropriate steps, consistent with law, to prioritize humanitarian relief, including admission and resettlement through the United States Refugee Admissions Program, for Afrikaners in South Africa who are victims of unjust racial discrimination.” The directive also included a reduction in aid to South Africa.

President Trump has accused the South African government of targeting Afrikaner farmers through land expropriation efforts without compensation. Trump, alongside Secretary of State Marco Rubio and South African-born advisor Elon Musk, has characterized the policy as discriminatory.

Despite these claims, South Africa's Department of International Relations has rejected the accusations, stating in a February statement: “It is ironic that the executive order makes provision for refugee status in the US for a group in South Africa that remains amongst the most economically privileged, while vulnerable people in the US from other parts of the world are being deported and denied asylum despite real hardship.”

South Africa threatens to cut minerals supply amid US aid cuts

This policy shift has drawn criticism for its apparent inconsistency. While Afrikaners, who still maintain substantial economic and political influence in post-apartheid South Africa, are being resettled under humanitarian grounds, many asylum seekers from Latin America, Asia, and the Middle East continue to face deportation or lengthy detentions under the same administration.

Comedian Leah Jazz satirized the narrative of Afrikaner victimhood in a widely circulated Instagram video, mocking the idea that white South Africans are oppressed.

“I then need to wash, so I have a dip in our pool which is used for bathing and drinking as we have no running water,” she says in the clip. “Then I sit down to apply for a job I'm not qualified for, and cry when I don't get it.”

Afrikaners have historically been part of South Africa’s ruling class. Until the end of apartheid in 1994, English and Afrikaner colonists dominated political and economic life under a racially segregated system that denied the Black majority basic rights.

On January 21, President Trump signed a separate order realigning the broader refugee admissions framework, stating that the country lacked “the ability to absorb large numbers of migrants... in a manner that does not compromise the availability of resources for Americans.”

Trump's allegations against South Africa come as the latter filed a case at the International Court of Justice against Israel, a close US ally, for committing genocide in the Gaza Strip.

 

Sunday, May 11, 2025

A new ‘Muslim Ban’

 

President Donald Trump signs executive order, attempting to end birthright citizenship, other immigration actions. Photo: Micky

With the stroke of a pen, President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order titled, “Protecting The United States From Foreign Terrorists And Other National Security And Public Safety Threats,” widely known as the “Travel Ban” and by some, the “Muslim Ban.” The order was signed on Jan. 20, hours after the president was sworn in.

The order begins a process of federal agencies determining which nationalities will face partial or total visa bans from countries where “vetting and screening” information is so deficient as to warrant blocking entry into the U.S.

The updated measure is a controversial law from Mr. Trump’s previous 2016-2020 term which targeted people from several Muslim-majority, Arab and African countries.

The new order intensifies scrutiny of those already in the U.S. and introduces provisions to possibly deport individuals who were lawfully issued visas within the past four years after the ban had been repealed. Former President Joe Biden reversed the ban upon taking office in 2021.

---

Rights organizations are now gearing up for an anticipated battle against the “Trump Travel Ban 2.0,” which was expected to go into effect 60 days after its signing.

“People who came to what is supposed to be the land of freedom and opportunity completely legally are now being told to keep their heads down and their mouths shut, or the government may deport them because of where they were born,” said a statement by the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization, that opposes the measure.  

NIAC is urging the administration to reverse the policy and is calling on Congress and the public to stand against these measures.

The language of President Trump’s new order did not name any targeted countries. However, the 2017 ban targeted seven Muslim-majority nations: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen and in 2020, was expanded to include Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar, Nigeria, and Tanzania.

The measure was met with protests and legal challenges, however, the Supreme Court in 2018 upheld the final version of the measure, which covered 13 mostly Muslim-majority countries, ruling in favor of Mr. Trump’s executive power. 

In a statement, the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) said it strongly opposes the Executive Order and called on the Trump administration not to stigmatize

and target entire communities, which they argued, only sows division.

“The new order goes a step further than its 2017 predecessor by adding language that opens the door to ideological exclusion by allowing the government to deny visas or entry based on perceived political opinions, religious beliefs, or cultural backgrounds,” said ADC in a statement.

Opponents view reenacting the law as another avenue for the Trump administration’s aggressive deportation agenda.

The order calls for: The U.S. State Department in coordination with the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence to identify resources that may be used to ensure that foreign nationals “seeking admission” to the U.S., or

“who are already” in the U.S. are screened to the “maximum degree” possible. This will apply particularly to people coming from regions or nations with “identified security risks,” said the order.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), hosted a virtual community briefing on Jan. 23 about the potential impact of the president’s first executive orders on Muslims in America and other issues.

“Although President Trump did not immediately restore his original Muslim Ban, he signed executive orders that could set the stage for a new ban, upend birthright citizenship, embolden Israeli settlers to commit more horrific violence in the West Bank, and spark an unprecedented crackdown on both free speech and legal immigration to silence critics of the Israeli government,” said CAIR Director of Government Affairs Robert S. McCaw in a statement.

Some who were adversely affected by the measures in Mr. Trump’s first term are concerned about his second term.

For instance, the impact of President Trump’s original bans was extensive on Iranian nationals and Iranian Americans and other nationals who were targeted, according to NIAC.

Over 40,000 Iranians applying for nonimmigrant and immigrant visas were directly impacted by the previous ban, said the group.  During a Jan. 21 Twitter/X-Space discussion that NIAC conducted on the new order, panelists expressed concern about the new ban’s impact on individuals already in the U.S. and the broad definitions that could lead to deportation, particularly for those with ties to certain organizations or activities.

Human Rights Watch in a wide-ranging statement condemning President Trump’s immigration orders said Executive Orders that create “enhanced vetting” for visa applicants from “regions or nations identified as security risks” could lead to racial profiling.

“We will not stand by as governments trample on human rights,” said Tirana Hassan, executive director at Human Rights Watch, in a statement.

“We will hold the Trump administration and others accountable for policies that erode freedoms and undermine equality. And we will stand in solidarity with human rights defenders everywhere, which means ordinary people, in the United States and beyond who are fighting tirelessly for dignity, freedom, and justice,” she said.

Friday, May 9, 2025

Wireless Charging

 

Why the old charging model falls short

EVs aren’t the future—they’re already here. From suburban driveways to dense city streets, electric cars, vans, buses, and trucks are quickly becoming the norm. But charging? That’s where things start to fall apart.

Plug-in stations still fail nearly half the time, mostly due to hardware or payment glitches (INSIDEEVS). And the industry’s current workarounds—bigger batteries and ultra-fast chargers—solve one issue but create others. Bigger batteries mean more range, but also more cost, more weight, and a heavier environmental footprint.

 Ford Transit shuttle van charging wirelessly with Electreon’s stationary charging while parked at the “Triangle” in Detroit, Michigan (credit: ELECTREON)Enlrage image
Ford Transit shuttle van charging wirelessly with Electreon’s stationary charging while parked at the “Triangle” in Detroit, Michigan (credit: Micky)

Ultra-fast chargers? They come with serious baggage. A single 1.2 MW charger powering one vehicle’s battery can consume as much electricity in an hour as two or three homes use in an entire month. Scaling that kind of demand is pricey, complex, and unsustainable.

JPost Videos

115.4K

Why? Because the approach mirrors gas stations: stop, charge, go. But EVs aren’t gas cars, and the grid isn’t built for this kind of strain.

So what kind of charging model actually works—for cities, fleets, and the grid?

Wireless charging: A smarter, scalable alternative

Electreon, a company based in Beit Yanai, Israel, has developed a wireless EV charging system that makes the road itself part of the energy solution. Using coils embedded beneath the pavement, Electreon’s system sends power wirelessly to vehicles—whether they’re driving, crawling through traffic, or parked.

It’s powered by a technology called Dynamic Wireless Power Transfer (DWPT), which uses magnetic induction to transfer energy from road to vehicle. Think wireless phone charging—only scaled up for electric cars, delivery vans, buses, and trucks.

Wherever the vehicle is, it charges automatically. Commuters top up while circling for parking. Buses charge while boarding passengers. Vans fill up while stopped at the depot. No cables. No waiting. No hassle.

This continuous charging model keeps vehicles moving while easing grid pressure. A cloud-based platform manages it all, scheduling charging during off-peak hours to cut costs and improve efficiency. That means lower TCO, less battery wear, and reliable charging even in dense, high-traffic areas.


And because the infrastructure is safely embedded in the road, it’s tamper-proof and nearly maintenance-free—unlike plug-in stations that regularly break down. 

One system for every EV

Electreon’s system works across vehicle types: buses, trucks, taxis, ride-hailing fleets, delivery vans, and private cars all share the same invisible infrastructure. Whether installed on roads, in parking lots, or at curbsides, the setup is universal and cost-effective.

Deploying the tech along busy routes used by a mix of vehicles boosts efficiency and makes the model financially viable—especially for fleet-heavy operations like BRT lines, last-mile delivery, or shared mobility. And it’s fully automated—no driver input needed.

The company recently announced plans to launch a home charger, extending its wireless technology to private EVs, making the offering even more compelling for everyday drivers.

Flexible business models also make it easier to adopt. Operators can pay per charge, like a utility, or opt for Charging-as-a-Service (CaaS), with a fixed monthly fee that covers energy and software. The system can be licensed to public and private partners to support broader rollout and shared investment.  

Live around the world

Electreon’s tech is already on the ground. It will charge Haifa’s Metronit BRT lines, already powers Electra Afikim’s depot in Rosh Ha’ayin, and will soon operate lines near Petach Tikva’s Grand Mall. In the U.S., it’s deployed beneath the country’s first public wireless charging road in Michigan and keeping UCLA’s campus shuttles moving—right on time for the 2028 Olympics.

In Germany, it’s supporting electric freight along the Bavarian autobahn. And leading automakers have already partnered with Electreon to integrate the technology into new EVs and retrofit existing ones. With policy support from Michigan’s innovation corridor and EU transport initiatives, the momentum is growing. 

Built for the future

According to the IEA, by 2030, one in three new buses sold globally will be electric. By 2035, EVs are expected to make up 25% of all vehicles on the road. And a 2025 McKinsey survey found that 38% of non-EV owners are ready to switch—if charging improves.

Wireless charging may be the missing link—not just to EV adoption, but to a better EV experience.

As the world shifts to electric, and vehicles begin to drive themselves, Electreon’s system is already built for what comes next: always on, always ready, and invisible by design.

It’s not just a glimpse of the future. It’s infrastructure that finally fits how we move.


OBESITY (FAT)

  Our people are falling more and more During his 1984 presidential campaign, Reverend Jesse Jackson used unwise language in what he thought...