ALB Micki

Tuesday, December 3, 2024

Raising the retirement age

 


Older Americans should pay close attention and make sure they support candidates who will protect the benefits they have earned—and even increase them—in the fast approaching November elections.The cost-of-living adjustment announced Thursday by the U.S. Social Security Administration for more than 72 million senior citizens should serve as a reminder, said economic justice advocates, that the monthly Social Security payments—the "bedrock" of financial security for 58% of recipients—are on election ballots this year.


The administration announced a 2.5% cost-of-living adjustment, commonly known as COLA, for 2025. People who get retirement benefits through the broadly popular New Deal-era program will see their payments adjusted starting in January 2025, and people with disabilities who rely on Supplemental Security Income (SSI) will receive increased benefits starting in December.


To Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works (SSW), which advocates to protect and expand the program, the COLA announcement underscored the vast differences in how Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump are likely to approach the Social Security program should they win the presidency in November.


Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, both co-sponsored legislation to update the COLA formula to better reflect the cost of living for seniors and people with disabilities, noted Altman.


"Republicans have a different perspective," she said. "The Republican Study Committee (which comprises over 80% of House Republicans) proposes annual budgets that include Social Security cuts. Page 104 of the Fiscal Year 2025 Republican Study Committee Budget calls the automatic nature of COLAs a 'problem' and implies that they should be subjected to annual Congressional approval. It also claims that the current COLA formula is too generous. Social Security beneficiaries likely disagree!"


The authors of Project 2025, the right-wing policy agenda co-written by dozens of people who worked in the Trump White House from 2017-21, have also endorsed increasing the full retirement age from 67 to 69, which would cut benefits for nearly three-quarters of Americans.


The current formula for the COLA is based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W), but advocates have called for the Social Security Administration (SSA) to instead take into consideration the CPI-E, which measures the spending of Americans 62 years of age and older.


"The formula currently used to calculate annual COLAs under-measures the expenses that Social Security beneficiaries face," said Altman. "Seniors spend a greater proportion of their income on medical expenses―and the Social Security COLA should reflect that."


For beneficiaries who last year received $1,870 per month, the 2.5% increase will give them an additional $46.80 each month, Social Security and Medicare policy analyst Mary Johnson toldNewsweek.


"That's only going to buy about 14 gallons of gasoline per month at today's prices, or maybe enough groceries for one to last two or three days," she added.


Richard Fiesta, executive director of the Alliance for Retired Americans, said the group welcomes the COLA, but warned that "many older Americans struggle to make ends meet and afford even the most basic necessities like housing, food, and prescription drugs."


"We need a COLA that better reflects how seniors spend their money," said Fiesta. "Strengthening Social Security and increasing benefits must be a national priority. If billionaires and the top 1% pay their fair share into the system, we can afford to increase benefits across the board and ensure Social Security is there for our children and grandchildren."


"Raising the retirement age, slashing benefits and privatizing the program are among retirees' top concerns," he added. "Older Americans should pay close attention and make sure they support candidates who will protect the benefits they have earned—and even increase them—in the fast approaching November elections."


Rep. John Larson (D-Conn.) pointed to the Social Security 2100 Act, legislation that would apply federal payroll taxes to earnings above $400,000 to ensure millionaires and billionaires pay their fair share toward funding and expanding Social Security.


"There is an urgent need to act to not only protect Social Security from the cuts that my Republican colleagues have proposed [but to] enhance benefits," said Larson..

Ahead of the elections, said Altman, "the bottom line is that Democrats want to make annual COLAs more accurate and generous, while Republicans want to make them stingier."


"Democrats also support other policies that would lower costs for Social Security beneficiaries, including Harris' recently released plan to expand Medicare to include home care, hearing, and vision benefits," she said. "Older voters should bear that in mind this November."

Increase' Parents' Earnings

 

This kind of payoff is almost unheard of in government labor-market policies.

While Republican proposals for solving the childcare crisis in the presidential campaign have ranged from recruiting "grandpa or grandma" as babysitters to slashing providers' certification requirements—with presidential candidate Donald Trump failing to give a coherent answer when asked about the issue last month—a new study delivers a simple message about how the benefits of public spending on childcare significantly outweigh the costs.


Researchers at Yale and Brown universities analyzed the universal pre-kindergarten program in New Haven, Connecticut, and found that "politicians could massively increase Americans' earnings" by expanding investments in such programs.


The New Haven program began as the result of a 1996 court ruling and is open to all families in the city regardless of income—but it uses a lottery system for enrollment due to limited funding and space.


The paper the researchers published with the National Bureau of Economic Research shows that parents whose children were selected in New Haven's lottery had 11 more hours of childcare than those who weren't able to benefit from the tuition-free universal pre-K program—enough to increase the parents' earnings by 21.7% even after their kids moved on to elementary school.


That increase makes childcare spending "one of the most effective, pro-work policies in the U.S.," said Washington Post economic columnist Heather Long.


The added earnings stemmed largely from the parents' ability to continue working without taking time off to fill in gaps left by a lack of childcare, particularly because New Haven's program includes extended hours, with children able to attend as early as 7:30 am and as late as 5:30 pm.


The paper emphasizes that families that didn't get a pre-K slot still utilized other childcare programs out of necessity—but they had to pay for them out of pocket and were able to send their children to the programs for fewer hours per week than those who won the lottery.


"A few more hours of care can have long-run returns for families that are quite a bit larger than the costs of provision," Seth D. Zimmerman, a research associate at Yale who co-authored the study, told the Post.


Combining the added earnings for parents and other economic benefits associated with early childhood education, the researchers found, every dollar spent on providing tuition-free full-time childcare yielded $6 in benefits.


"This kind of payoff is almost unheard of in government labor-market policies—much higher than for most other pro-work programs, such as the earned-income tax credit," wrote Post columnist Catherine Rampell in an analysis on Monday.


The study was published days after the White House released an issue brief titledChildcare Is Infrastructure, which the Biden administration said was made evident by its $24 billion investment in the industry through the American Rescue Plan.


"Introduction of universal pre-K across various states led to increased pre-K enrollment and higher employment rates among mothers with young children in those areas on average," said the White House. "Consistent with an increase in overall economic activity, places that introduced universal pre-k also had larger increases in new business applications and the number of establishments than places that did not."


Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee, has expressed support for expanding childcare programs and lowering costs for families, including by restoring the expanded child tax credit and providing an extra tax break for families with newborns.


The new study suggests that in the presidential campaign, "childcare should be front and center," wrote Rampell. "If you want to help workers, help them care for their kids."

Another US Oil Exec 'Caught Colluding With OPEC'



We cannot allow fossil fuel companies to gouge the American public in concert with OPEC while raking in record profits.Consumer advocates demanded congressional hearings on alleged price fixing by oil giants on Monday after the Federal Trade Commission banned an executive from serving on the board of Chevron, saying he had colluded with international representatives to keep oil prices high.


The FTC said it would prohibit John B. Hess, CEO of the Hess Corporation, from serving on Chevron's Board of Directors as part of Chevron's acquisition of the company, citing Hess' public and private communications "with the past and current secretaries general of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and an official from Saudi Arabia."


"In these communications, Mr. Hess stressed the importance of oil market stability and inventory management and encouraged these officials to take actions on these issues and speak about them at different events," said the FTC.


The FTC's complaint marks the second time since May that an oil executive has been accused of collusion and price fixing to ensure Americans would continue paying high prices for gas, adding an estimated $500 per year, per vehicle, in fuel costs for the average U.S. household.


Democratic lawmakers have demanded a probe by the Department of Justice into collusion by fossil fuel companies, following the FTC's revelation that Scott Sheffield, founder of Pioneer Natural Resources, communicated with OPEC representatives via text messages, WhatsApp, and in person to encourage high oil prices.


"Americans who are struggling to make ends meet cannot afford any more price fixing collusion between Big Oil CEOs and foreign countries."


Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) said that "jail time should seriously be considered," highlighting the financial pain Sheffield's actions added to households already struggling to afford groceries, childcare, and other essentials.


The five largest U.S. oil companies have reported more than $250 billion in profits over the last two years.


"We cannot allow fossil fuel companies to gouge the American public in concert with OPEC while raking in record profits," said Tyson Slocum, director of consumer advocacy group Public Citizen's energy program. "The FTC is lifting the veil on an effort, apparently by multiple U.S. oil companies, to communicate with foreign actors to artificially raise energy prices for American families and around the world. We reiterate the call for Congress to immediately hold hearings to investigate illegal conduct by Big Oil."


Government watchdog Accountable.US described the news as "another Big Oil CEO caught colluding with OPEC."


"Americans who are struggling to make ends meet cannot afford any more price fixing collusion between Big Oil CEOs and foreign countries," said Chris Marshall, a spokesperson for the group. "They should be held accountable to make sure consumers pay a fair price at the pump."

 

Longshoremen's Labor Battle

 

Instead of calling for government intervention, a far more productive tact would be to press the companies to meet the workers' very reasonable demandsThe president of the AFL-CIO sent a letter to House Republicans on Thursday asking them not to intervene in contract negotiations between the International Longshoremen's Association and the U.S. Maritime Alliance, which could lead to the first East Coast port strike since 1977 if a deal is not struck by October 1.


The letter came in response to another letter sent by Republican lawmakers to U.S. President Joe Biden on September 19, urging him to "find a reasonable resolution to these contract disputes" and to "utilize every authority at its disposal to ensure the continuing flow of goods" if a strike does occur.


"Averting a strike is the responsibility of the employers who refuse to offer ILA members a contract that reflects the dignity and value of their labor," AFL-CIO president Elizabeth H. Shuler wrote in response to the GOP representatives. "The fight for a fair contract for longshoremen is the entire labor movement's fight."


"The public strongly supports these front-line workers and their just demand for economic security."


A potential strike would see between 25,000 and 50,000 workers walk off the job on Tuesday at 36 locations along 14 East and Gulf Coast port authorities, including 10 of the busiest in North America.


The union wants substantial raises to cover the cost of inflation. While West Coast port workers make a base wage of $54.85, their East and Gulf Coast counterparts make only $39.


The ILA is also demanding better healthcare, and a promise not to install automated or semi-automated terminals at the ports. However, negotiations between the union and the U.S. Maritime Alliance (USMX) broke down in June when the ILA said that USMX had begun using an automated gate to allow trucks into ports, in violation of the current contract.


The union has since contacted USMX to discuss wage increases, but the company has not upped its offer.


"My ILA members are not going to accept these insulting offers that are a joke considering the work my ILA longshore workers perform, and the billion-dollar profits the companies make off the backs of their labor," ILA president and lead negotiator Harold J. Daggett said in a statement on Monday.


"The blame for a coast wide strike in a week that will shut down all ports on the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts falls squarely on the shoulders of USMX," Daggett continued.


In their letter, the Republican representatives warned about how the strike "would result in delays and dire impacts to our supply chains, our economy, and the American consumer." They evoked the "supply-chain crisis" during the Covid-19 pandemic that was a major driver of inflation, saying that a one-week strike would cause a one-and-a-half month backlog.


However, Shuler said that the GOP letter made a strike—and its economic consequences—more likely, not less. That's because the leaning on Biden to use his authority to "ensure the continuing flow of goods," suggested Shuler, could reasonably be interpreted as a request for him to file a judicial injunction under the Taft-Hartely Act to stop a strike from taking place.


"History tells us that when companies can count on an injunction against a strike, they do not negotiate in good faith to reach an agreement. By even suggesting a possible injunction, your letter makes a deal less likely and a strike all the more likely," Shuler said.


This is especially the case because the Biden administration toldReuters earlier this month that it had "never invoked Taft-Hartley to break a strike and are not considering doing so now."


"Yet," Shuler told the representatives, "your letter tries to suggest otherwise, giving the companies reason to dig in their heels. Instead of calling for government intervention, a far more productive tact would be to press the companies to meet the workers' very reasonable demands."


Shuler defended the workers' rights to wages that keep pace with living costs as well as job security in a changing technological landscape.


"Like workers in many other industries—from hospitality to healthcare to film and television—they need fair contract provisions that protect their jobs from being eliminated by automation," Shuler said.


She also noted that the port workers had made significant sacrifices to keep the ports moving during the early years of Covid-19.


"Throughout the pandemic, longshore workers never took a day off, risking their health and lives to make sure shelves were stocked and the supply chain remained strong," Shuler wrote. "The public strongly supports these front-line workers and their just demand for economic security."


She continued: "It adds insult to injury to encourage USMX to provoke a strike rather than agree to a fair contract for the workers who kept food on the table and our economy running through the darkest days of the Covid-19 crisis."


The Transportation Trades Department (TTD) of the AFL-CIO also spoke out against government intervention in the negotiations.


"Relying on Taft-Hartley is not a winning strategy and should not be USMX's expected path to resolution," TTD president and scretary Greg Regan and Shari Semelsberger said in a statement. "The Biden-Harris administration has already stated, in their own words, 'We've never invoked Taft-Hartley to break a strike and are not considering doing so now.'"


Regan and Semelsberg added that USMX was to blame for the risk of a strike.


"Let us be clear: The employers, not the workers, have shirked their responsibility and punted labor negotiations to the 11th hour, when the damage to the public and the national supply chain would be most detrimental," they said. "While USMX seeks to cast blame on the frontline workers who move our supply chain, they are at fault."


"Remember this as they seek shelter from the disaster that they created," Regan and Semelsberg concluded.


This piece has been updated with a statement from the Transportation Trades Department of the AFL-CIO.

'Global Oligarchy' Reigns

 A report published Monday by the humanitarian group Oxfam warns that decades of intensifying inequality have left the world in the grip of a "global oligarchy" under which the richest sliver of humanity owns more wealth than nearly everyone else combined—a state of affairs that undermines democratic institutions and international cooperation on climate, pandemics, and other crises.


Oxfam's analysis of data from the investment banking giant UBS found that the fortune controlled by the top 1% is now larger than the collective wealth of the bottom 95%.


Such inequality pervades the global economy, Oxfam noted, with a small number of corporations dominating key sectors. Nearly half of the global seed market, for example, is controlled by just two corporations, Bayer and Corteva. At the same time, just three U.S.-based financial behemoths—Blackrock, State Street, and Vanguard—oversee nearly 20% of the world's investable assets, around $20 trillion.


What's more, such massive corporations are increasingly run by billionaires: According to Oxfam, a billionaire either heads or is the top shareholder of more than a third of the world's leading 50 corporations.


"While we often hear about great power rivalries undermining multilateralism, it is clear that extreme inequality is playing a massive role," Oxfam executive director Amitabh Behar said in a statement. "In recent years the ultra-wealthy and powerful corporations have used their vast influence to undermine efforts to solve major global problems such as tackling tax dodging, making Covid-19 vaccines available to the world, and canceling the albatross of sovereign debt."


"Enabled by rich nations, the ultra-wealthy individuals and corporations they control that benefit from and perpetuate extreme inequality have long impeded international efforts to create a more equitable society."


Oxfam released its new report, titled Multilateralism in an Era of Global Oligarchy, ahead of the United Nations' annual high-level general debate, whose 2024 theme is "leaving no one behind: acting together for the advancement of peace, sustainable development, and human dignity for present and future generations."


The extreme concentration of global wealth at the very top directly undercuts such objectives, Oxfam argues in its new report, with the ultra-rich using the wealth they've accumulated to influence policy decisions that fuel destructive inequities.


"Extreme inequality is, consequently, both a cause and effect of a movement toward global oligarchy, broadly defined here as the ability of the ultra-wealthy to shape political decision-making in ways that increase their wealth," the report notes. "Democracies are afflicted, as the ultra-rich—often through the powerful corporate interests that act on their behalf—can tilt policymaking in their favor at the expense of the majority. Nor is the movement toward oligarchy confined by national borders. It is global, impacting political decision-making within countries and at the international level."


Behar said Monday that "the shadow of global oligarchy hangs over this year's U.N. General Assembly."


"The iconic U.N. podium is increasingly feeling diminished in a world in which billionaires are calling the shots," Behar added.


Oxfam argued the massive wealth gap between the rich and everyone else—as well as the chasm between the so-called Global North and Global South—is antithetical to the kinds of international cooperation needed to tackle existential emergencies, including the worsening climate crisis.


The report points to longstanding efforts by multinational corporations, ultra-wealthy individuals, and rich countries to obstruct efforts to establish more progressive global tax structures, depriving lower-income countries of revenue that could be used to combat the climate emergency and improve healthcare and education systems.


Corporations have also wielded their influence to tank efforts to reform patent laws that give pharmaceutical companies monopoly control over lifesaving therapeutics and vaccines, which had devastating consequences during the Covid-19 pandemic.


"Enabled by rich nations, the ultra-wealthy individuals and corporations they control that benefit from and perpetuate extreme inequality have long impeded international efforts to create a more equitable society, especially those led by Global South countries," the new report states. "The movement toward global oligarchy ultimately perpetuates neocolonial relationships, shaping policy in ways that further increase the wealth of ultrarich individuals, mostly in the Global North, at the expense of the Global South."

Oxfam argued Monday that only global solidarity "can reverse the movement toward global oligarchy."


"Global South governments and civil society organizations are leading the push for a [World Health Organization] pandemic treaty with strong provisions on technology transfer and benefit-sharing, a U.N. tax convention with ambitious standards on taxing corporations and the rich, and a new international debt architecture that facilitates comprehensive debt restructuring," the report states. "These initiatives are critical opportunities for the international community to replace division with solidarity, a necessity for addressing other pressing issues such as climate change."


"Ultimately," the report adds, "a more equitable international order without extreme concentrations of wealth—where corporations pay their fair share, global public health is prioritized, and where all countries can invest in their own people—benefits everyone."

Boar's Head Plant Behind Listeria Deaths


About 500 workers lost their current jobs when Boar's Head on Friday announced the closure of the Virginia meatpacking plant behind a deadly listeria outbreak.


A chapter of the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) union, which represents the workers, said in a statement that the closure was "especially unfortunate" given that the workforce was not to blame for the outbreak, which killed at least nine people nationwide.


The UFCW announced that it had reached a deal with the company to allow the workers to transfer to another Boar's Head facility or receive a severance package "above and beyond" what's required by law.


"Thankfully these workers have a union they can count on to always have their backs," the union statement said.


The outbreak caused nine deaths and 57 hospitalizations, and led to the recall of millions of pounds of Boar's Head deli meat. The company has already been targeted in a number of wrongful death and other lawsuits.


Listeria, a bacterial illness, originated from the Boar's Head plant in the small town of Jarratt, Virginia, as genome sequencing tests confirmed in late July. The company said this week that the contamination had come from liverwurst processing and announced it would discontinue the product.


A 2022 inspection of the plant found that it posed an "imminent threat" to public health, according to United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) records released this week. At the time, the plant already had "rust, mold, garbage, and insects on the plant floors and walls," The New York Timesreported.


Sarah Sorscher, a food safety expert at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, told the Times that "they shouldn't have allowed this company to keep producing ready-to-eat products, lunch meat that's going to go on people’s tables, when they're seeing this level of violation. Consumers had to die before this plant got shut down, really is the bottom line."


More recent USDA records, which were released in late August, also showed wretched conditions at the plant.

Monday, December 2, 2024

Minnesotans turn to saunas for warmth

 Ed Kranz set up his mobile sauna next to a frozen beach at Lebanon Hills Regional Park in Eagan, Minnesota, on a bone-chilling Sunday morning during a weekend cold snap.

Ed and his wife Colleen own Saunable, “a wood-fired sauna experience on wheels.” After about 8 to 12 minutes of sweating in the Kranz’s 185 degrees Fahrenheit (85 degrees Celsius) sauna, a group moseyed outside into a 15 degrees Fahrenheit (9 degrees Celsius) Minnesota afternoon. They sat around a fire in bathing suits to gradually lower their body temperatures before repeating the process three or four more times. One brave soul submerged himself into a hole in the frozen lake for a post-sauna cold plunge.

The group was not alone. As temperatures drop into the teens, Minnesotans are embracing sauna culture for warmth and community. Devotees say the state’s sauna mania is about more than sweat and snow — it is the product of Old World traditions intersecting with newfangled internet-based communities, and a desire for social connection in a society that can feel isolating.

How it works

Sauna and cold plunges go together like peanut butter and jelly, said Glenn Auerbach, a self-described sauna evangelist and the founder and editor of SaunaTimes. Auerbach started the website in 2008 to share his thoughts, research and conversations with an ever-expanding cadre of movers and shakers in the sauna world. He and his interlocutors mull over topics like the nitty-gritty of sauna construction, how to cultivate “good sauna vibes” and the potential health benefits of the sauna lifestyle.


A typical temperature to achieve the holy trinity of the sauna experience — heat, steam and ventilation — is about 180 to 200 degrees F (82-93 degrees C), a temperature that starkly contrasts Minnesota’s frigid winter weather.


“Within our saunas, the stove should always win,” he said.


While sauna truisms such as this provide some degree of uniformity, there is also leeway for personal preference.


The craftiest of the lot in the sauna community can build a facility for about $10,000, according to Auerbach. Those looking to skip the physical labor can also outsource the construction. Sauna’s popularity, which enthusiasts say spiked following the COVID-19 pandemic, has brought with it a rise in manufacturers selling saunas for about $30,000 to $40,000.


While sauna’s cultural cache may have increased in recent years, the practice long predates the Instagrammable spaces popping up in recent years, Auerbach said.


‘This is a tradition that’s actually for everyone’

The smell of cedar wood has been lodged in Justin Juntunen’s memory ever since he first stepped into his family’s sauna as a child. Juntunen, the founder of Cedar and Stone Nordic Sauna, is a descendant of Finnish immigrants who came to America in the 1880s. They and their compatriots brought with them an appreciation for saunas and the communal values the steam-filled rooms impart to local life.


People in Finland say there are more saunas than cars, Juntunen said. When immigrants like his grandfather came to Minnesota to work in the mines, mills or docks, they would often save up to build a farmhouse. But they would build a sauna first, living in the space while the main house was under construction. Later on, saunas would serve as informal town centers.

People gossiped in saunas, they gave birth in saunas and they died in saunas, Juntunen said. The public nature of the facilities reflects the egalitarian ethos that infuses Nordic culture, and sauna culture by extension, he added.

“This is a tradition that’s actually for everyone,” Juntunen said. “My favorite Nordic proverb is all people are created equal, but nowhere more so than in the sauna.”

A practice that became an internet trend

In addition to a desire for in-person experiences following the isolation wrought by the COVID-19 pandemic, sauna enthusiasts say interest rose after some of the internet’s most famous figures, such as podcasters Joe Rogan and Andrew Huberman, touted it.

“Every big podcaster in the world discovered that you could jump in cold water and it feels kind of good. And then people click on it online,” Juntunen said.

In this way, technology has been a paradox for sauna culture, he added. Digital media helped sauna culture grow at the same time as saunas were billed as reprieves from the pervasive reach of technology over every facet of daily life.

The Disease of Envy




Each of us has a gift from the Creator that we must offer to the struggle of our people for liberation. Jesus said it so beautifully: “He who would be your leader must be your servant.” Those of us who, for one reason or another, are accepted as leaders must increase our ability to serve. For it is only in serving that which is bigger than we are that we live and never die. That which is bigger than all of us is the liberation, totally, of our people in America, the Caribbean, Central and South America, Africa and the Isles of the Pacific.

Wherever Black people on this planet suffer, our goal should be to see our wounds healed, the damage repaired and all Black people free to bring again to the world what we originally brought, which was the light of knowledge and advanced civilization.

Many of us come with ideas and thoughts to advance the struggle of our people, but sometimes we do not know how to dialogue with another person who also has an idea. Sometimes our egos get caught up in what we wish to propose and sometimes it blinds us to a better idea or proposal that could come from one of our Brothers or Sisters. In the process of dialogue, we must learn to subordinate ourselves to what is best for the whole. That becomes difficult if we are moved by vain expectations.



All of us that worked and struggled in the ’60s, ’70s and ’80s, and are blessed to be alive in the year 2004, know that we do not have as many years in front of us as we have behind us. So, the lessons that we have learned from our struggle should make us know how much we need one another. When you know you have a need for your Brother or Sister in the struggle for our liberation, then we act in a way that facilitates the growth of the union of all of us who are involved in this struggle.


One of the diseases that hinders Black people from success is the malady called envy. It is one of our worst enemies and it masquerades, oft-times, as a friend. It masquerades oft-times as a supporter. It smiles when it does not mean it.


It masquerades a demonic mind that will destroy progress for the sake of destroying an individual who may be carrying the moment. If we have this disease, we need to understand what medication we need to remove it, because that disease has destroyed Black organizations and Black leadership.


The Honorable Marcus Garvey, one of the greatest leaders of our time, knew and was concerned about the future. He was not a man looking only for his own greatness, but he understood that his people were great.


In order for his idea to gradually take root among the people, that idea had to be fed to others who would wrap their being around that idea. Then, when his physical presence was no longer there, the idea that made Marcus Garvey who he was, and is, would live. Jesus could never die as long as the principles on which he built his life were inculcated into his students and disciples.



So, the enemy is always aware of the power of ideas and is always working to reduce great men to silliness in order to obscure the power of their ideas. To highlight Marcus Garvey’s motto or theme, “One God, one aim and one destiny,” without mention of his idea or plan to bring about that one aim, one destiny and one God, is to deliberately distort the value of that man and his ideas.


Even though most of us, as nationalists, did not agree with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.—in that we should allow anybody to beat us and we turn the other cheek and don’t do our best to take that person out—the yin and yang between the talk of Brother Malcolm X and the talk of Brother Martin is what produced a dynamic that created movement among our people.


That’s like the dynamic between W.E.B. DuBois and Marcus Garvey, and DuBois and Booker T. Washington. They all had ideas, but time refines these ideas and people grow, not to take this idea or that, but to see the synthesis of things in order to bring these disparate groups into one mighty force that creates movement that cannot be stopped, that lives after individuals with charisma die.


Martin Luther King Jr. was an evolving giant, but to reduce his revolutionary development to “I have a dream” is to kill the idea that was ingrained in Dr. King that he kept evolving toward, where we are today. Dr. King was killed not because he had a dream, but because he opposed the war in Vietnam and saw the hypocrisy of those saying to Black people that we should be non-violent toward White people and then let them send us to be violent in Vietnam against a people who did not do anything to us. When he started to use his celebrity—which they created for him—to work against their ideas, then they decided that he had to be killed.


During the ’60s, there was an idea that united us, when we stopped using the term “Negro” and began to see ourselves as Black people. In 1955, in Bandung, Indonesia, Sukarno called an Afro-Asian meeting of all people of color. No White people were invited to that meeting. Adam Clayton Powell, a very, very light-skinned Brother, and a warrior, was invited to represent Black people at the Bandung Conference.


Right after that conference, Blackness began to unite our struggle all over the world. Although many of us may not see the value of language in conveying ideas, the enemy knows that, if you shift your language, you may shift your focus, then he can re-divide what had been united.


We saw ourselves as Black, not Georgian, Mississippian, New Yorkers, but Black people catching hell in America. When we saw our Brothers from Haiti who were victimized by the French, so he had a French name and a French language; or we saw our Brothers in Santo Domingo speaking Spanish, we knew they were Black and our Brothers, even though they spoke Spanish, French, Dutch, or another European language. Our Blackness made us one people. There are 80 million Black people in Brazil who speak Portuguese, but we would not let the language or culture of European colonizers divide us.


So, all of Africa, the Caribbean, Central and South America, and the Isles of the Pacific was ours. We saw ourselves not as a minority, but we outnumbered White people when we thought of ourselves as Black people first. We outnumbered them 11 to one on our planet. They became the minority and we were the majority, uniting for our liberation.


Now, Martin is gone, Malcolm is gone, Elijah is gone, and a shift comes in language. In Baltimore, there was a television show called “Black Star.” In New York, there was “Black News.” There was “Black Journal.” In every city in America, there was a TV show with the adjective “Black” describing some aspect of that show, but all of a sudden when the leadership was gone, their ranks became confused and the Civil Rights Movement integrated Black people into a system that was diametrically opposed to what we really need.


While we were celebrating being allowed to go into White hotels, motels and restaurants, we began losing what we had built as a result of segregation. Not only were we losing economically, we were losing the struggle, due to shifting language. When Dr. King was assassinated and 100 cities were set on fire, the enemy asked, “Who led this? Somebody must have led these Negroes for them to burn 100 cities. Who gave the order?” What they recognized, watching the nightly news every night, was that we were becoming a Nation without ever realizing what constitutes a nation.


Nations start with similar attitudes, out of which comes a system of belief. Out of that system of belief comes ideology, then a national community evolves out of that. But what was shaping our attitude? We all had a common attitude toward the government and racist police, because we saw them beating us down on television. Every night, we saw the fire hoses and the dogs set against Black people. We saw our people being beat down, so we had an automatic attitude toward White people. We knew in the ’60s who our enemy was, but today we don’t know that anymore.


There was a shift in language. They said, “It’s television that’s uniting these Negroes. Let’s see if we can shift this.” So, “Black Journal,” a national TV show, became “Tony’s Journal” and “Black” was dropped. “Black Star” and “Black News” were dropped. Black people were not talking “Black” anymore; we became the minority, the disadvantaged, then African Americans.


When you become an African American, how does that connect you to your African brother in Haiti, or your people in Grenada, Trinidad or Panama? The shift in language began to deteriorate the spirit that made us see ourselves as one dynamic people, suffering from a common enemy who inflicted us with a common disease. We must come back to the mindset that we had in the ’60s that was broken through the misuse of language.


They use people who we admire to introduce concepts that take us away from ourselves. They bring our scholars into universities like this one and, in order to get tenure, our scholars have to sacrifice something of the struggle of our ancestors for a dollar and to be recognized by the enemy as somebody of value. So, our leaders are all scattered now, wanting to be near to the enemy, and have a little money and security, while our people are in the valley of the shadow of death, going to hell in a rocketship.


So, the ndaba is important. There’s nothing more important than what these Brothers have called together. This is bigger than all of us in the room. It’s about getting our people back on course. It’s about taking the confusion out of language and speaking straight words, so that our people understand that the struggle is not over, because our young people are being separated from the struggle of their elders.


We must see ourselves as a nation within a nation—a nation that must not depend on a Kerry winning an election or a Bush being re-elected. Whoever is in office, our condition will not improve for the masses of our people unless we, as a unit, say that we are tired of what we are suffering and make a move to unite all of our people with an idea that will live after we are dead. And there is no idea bigger than the idea of freedom, justice, equality, truth and peace. The repair of our people is a must.


Scriptures say, “Envy is more cruel than the grave.” Once the spirit leaves the body and you put that body in a grave, worms begin to eat away the flesh. After a while, there’s nothing left but the bones, and the person becomes unrecognizable. You have to use forensic science to find out who it is. That’s what happens when we envy one another. We deteriorate and rot from within.


Do you know what makes us get rid of envy? When we know that each one of us has been gifted with a gift from a Mighty Creator and none of us are in this room without something special to offer. None of us are alive on this planet without a gift that marks and separates us from the next person, but not separates us in the sense that we are divided, but separates us in that each of us is unique.


As Muslims, we say, “Say He, Allah, is One.” He’s One, unique, incomparable, and so are you. There are no two snowflakes alike, no two raindrops alike, no two blades of grass alike. Your fingerprints, footprints and voiceprints are all different from your Brother’s and Sister’s. Each one of us has never been before and will never be again. That’s the infinite wisdom of a Mighty Creator.


So, when I look at you and you look at me, we are looking at individuals that there’s no one like, never was before, and won’t be again. This is our moment in time to unite our uniqueness and pass on to a succeeding generation the legacy of what we, in our uniqueness and our recognition of each other’s greatness, have accomplished in the long march toward total liberation.



Wall Street Drifts

 



U.S. stocks are kicking off December by drifting around their record heights on Monday.


The S&P 500 rose 0.1% in morning trading after closing its best month of the year at an all-time high. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was down 183 points, or 0.4%, as of 10:05 a.m. Eastern time, and the Nasdaq composite was 0.8% higher.


Super Micro Computer, a stock that’s been on an AI-driven roller coaster, soared 15% to help lead the market.


Following accusations of misconduct and the resignation of its public auditor, the maker of servers used in artificial-intelligence technology said an investigation found no evidence of misconduct by its management or by the board. It also said it doesn’t expect to restate its past financials and that it will find a new chief financial officer, appoint a general counsel and make other moves to strengthen its governance.

Intel rose 2.5% after it said CEO Pat Gelsinger has retired and stepped down from the board. The chip company said it’s looking for Gelsinger’s replacement, and Intel’s chair of the board said it’s “committed to restoring investor confidence.”

Stellantis, meanwhile, skidded following the announcement of its CEO’s departure. The U.S.-traded stock of the world’s fourth-largest automaker fell 7.4%. Carlos Tavares steps down after nearly four years in the top spot of the automaker, which owns car brands like Jeep, Citroën and Ram, amid an ongoing struggle with slumping sales and an inventory backlog at dealerships.


Utility PG&E had the biggest drop in the S&P 500, 5.3%, after saying it would sell $2.4 billion of stock and preferred shares to raise cash.


Retailers were mixed amid what’s expected to be the best Cyber Monday on record. Target, which recently gave a forecast for the holiday season that left investors discouraged, fell 3.2%. Walmart, which gave a more optimistic forecast, added 0.1%.

Amazon, which looks to benefit from online sales from Cyber Monday, rose 2.1%.


The stock market seemed to be taking Donald Trump’s latest threat on tariffs in stride. The president-elect on Saturday threatened 100% tariffs against a group of developing economies if they act to undermine the U.S. dollar. Trump said he wants the group, headlined by Brazil, Russia, India and China, to promise it won’t create a new currency or otherwise try to undercut the U.S. dollar.


The dollar has long been the currency of choice for global trade. Speculation has also been around a long time that other currencies could knock it off its mantle, but no contender has come close.


The U.S. dollar’s value rose Monday against several other currencies, but one of its strongest moves likely had less to do with the tariff threats. The euro fell amid a political battle in Paris over the French government’s budget. The euro sank 0.9% against the U.S. dollar and broke below $1.05.


In the bond market, Treasury yields rose and held onto their gains after a report showed the U.S. manufacturing sector is doing slightly better than feared. Manufacturing contracted again last month, but not by as much as economists expected, according to the Institute for Supply Management.

The yield on the 10-year Treasury climbed to 4.23% from 4.18% late Friday.


This upcoming week will have several highly anticipated updates on the job market, including the October job openings report, weekly unemployment benefits data and the all-important November jobs report.


Elsewhere, Chinese stocks led gains worldwide as monthly surveys showed improving conditions for manufacturing, partly driven by a surge in orders ahead of Trump’s inauguration next month.


Both official and private sector surveys of factory managers showed strong new orders and export orders, possibly partly linked to efforts by importers in the U.S. to beat potential tariff hikes by Trump once he takes office.


Indexes rose 0.7% in Hong Kong and 1.1% in Shanghai, but South Korea’s Kospi slipped 0.1%.


In Europe, France’s CAC 40 fell 0.2%, while Germany’s DAX returned 1%.


___

Khamenei replacements

  Ayatollah Ali Khamenei blocking Iran's internet (illustrative). (credit: Albi , KHAMENEI.IR, Walla) The diplomats had also discussed w...